Comments for Neil Hanlon http://blog.neilhanlon.com Tue, 17 May 2011 02:12:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on [TUTORIAL]: Making a member’s area in PHP and MySQL by Developer http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/03/22/member-area-tutorial-php-mysq/comment-page-1/#comment-2765 Developer Tue, 17 May 2011 02:12:25 +0000 http://neilhanlon.com/?p=312#comment-2765 Logout.php fixed : <?php session_start(); // < :oops: Logout.php fixed :
<?php
session_start(); // <

:oops:

]]> Comment on [TUTORIAL]: Making a member’s area in PHP and MySQL by Neil http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/03/22/member-area-tutorial-php-mysq/comment-page-1/#comment-2628 Neil Sun, 01 May 2011 15:35:14 +0000 http://neilhanlon.com/?p=312#comment-2628 What version of PHP are you using? What version of PHP are you using?

]]> Comment on [TUTORIAL]: Making a member’s area in PHP and MySQL by Gutai György http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/03/22/member-area-tutorial-php-mysq/comment-page-1/#comment-2618 Gutai György Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:13:57 +0000 http://neilhanlon.com/?p=312#comment-2618 full of errors - a freakin wast of time. full of errors – a freakin wast of time.

]]> Comment on Around the bend by Sohail http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2011/03/07/around-the-bend/comment-page-1/#comment-2211 Sohail Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:52:02 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=399#comment-2211 Liking the website, changed since I last saw it. I've made some changes to mine too have a look. Nice to know you're still keeping the blog updated. Get in touch with me via email if you'd be interested in writing for mine? Liking the website, changed since I last saw it. I’ve made some changes to mine too have a look. Nice to know you’re still keeping the blog updated.

Get in touch with me via email if you’d be interested in writing for mine?

]]> Comment on It’s that time of the year again! by Anonymous http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/12/20/its-that-time-of-the-year-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1964 Anonymous Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:01:59 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=364#comment-1964 You should post more often. I like hearing what you have to say. You should post more often. I like hearing what you have to say.

]]> Comment on Sudden moment of suspense by Erin http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/12/14/sudden-moment-of-suspense/comment-page-1/#comment-1889 Erin Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:08:42 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=355#comment-1889 Funny thing- all that you just talked about with the signaling without us knowing, i am learning in molecular biology- known as cell signaling. only a few years back we were able to have pretty clear concise maps of the ways cell signals make a pathway so that we are able to keep our insulin levels correct, or our heart to pump such as contracting the atrial walls and opening of the aortic valve to allow your blood to be processed throughout your body. these pathways are going on all the time, but the more they have been studied the more complex they are and they really do look like a signal path of something going on with a computer( neil you def understand is better than i). This is because there are multiple ways to turn on your genes to express what your cell is wanting or needing to do- this is thro the use of kinases and the phosphorylation of receptors and molecules within the cytoplasm that then turn on Ras(VERY important!- key in cancer!) with then turn on more kinases until get to a point to enter into the nucleus of the cell and therefore start replication, transcription, and translation of the gene to do the specific fxn your body wants. But this is only one way of thinking, there are also phosphatases that are used to de-phosphorylate the specific receptor, or turn on an up or downstream element(gene) that codes for a protein that therefore phosphorylates a phosphatase, which then will code for turning off the the specific cells fxn. there are so many different pathways, but one way to differentiate between them is the speed at which you need to response. so in the case of neural signaling- esp with you- there is an immediate response needed using a pathway known as JAK/STAT. Just some information thought you would be interested in. also my final is partly on this. If you are interested in this, the way to kinda of get into its field is not molecular biology anymore, but being a specific type of molecular biologist, such as neurobiologist to study the signaling pathways all they way to their cellular components. Love ya buddy! Erin Funny thing- all that you just talked about with the signaling without us knowing, i am learning in molecular biology- known as cell signaling. only a few years back we were able to have pretty clear concise maps of the ways cell signals make a pathway so that we are able to keep our insulin levels correct, or our heart to pump such as contracting the atrial walls and opening of the aortic valve to allow your blood to be processed throughout your body. these pathways are going on all the time, but the more they have been studied the more complex they are and they really do look like a signal path of something going on with a computer( neil you def understand is better than i). This is because there are multiple ways to turn on your genes to express what your cell is wanting or needing to do- this is thro the use of kinases and the phosphorylation of receptors and molecules within the cytoplasm that then turn on Ras(VERY important!- key in cancer!) with then turn on more kinases until get to a point to enter into the nucleus of the cell and therefore start replication, transcription, and translation of the gene to do the specific fxn your body wants. But this is only one way of thinking, there are also phosphatases that are used to de-phosphorylate the specific receptor, or turn on an up or downstream element(gene) that codes for a protein that therefore phosphorylates a phosphatase, which then will code for turning off the the specific cells fxn. there are so many different pathways, but one way to differentiate between them is the speed at which you need to response. so in the case of neural signaling- esp with you- there is an immediate response needed using a pathway known as JAK/STAT. Just some information thought you would be interested in. also my final is partly on this. If you are interested in this, the way to kinda of get into its field is not molecular biology anymore, but being a specific type of molecular biologist, such as neurobiologist to study the signaling pathways all they way to their cellular components.

Love ya buddy!

Erin

]]> Comment on Removing The Glove – Appropriate? by Neil http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/10/21/removing-the-glove-appropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-1618 Neil Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:29:04 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=353#comment-1618 Again, you've done a great job of misquoting things from the Bible. Would you like to try again, maybe with an ounce of intellect? I'm not trying to sound mean or argumentative.. I'm simply stating that you've accomplished nothing but reinstating the point I made about The Bible being quoted out of context. Again, you’ve done a great job of misquoting things from the Bible. Would you like to try again, maybe with an ounce of intellect?

I’m not trying to sound mean or argumentative.. I’m simply stating that you’ve accomplished nothing but reinstating the point I made about The Bible being quoted out of context.

]]> Comment on Removing The Glove – Appropriate? by Opinionator http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/10/21/removing-the-glove-appropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-1606 Opinionator Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:34:19 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=353#comment-1606 "But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water." http://bible.cc/2_peter/3-5.htm Lol, the earth wasn't made out of water, even if it was and god somehow magically turned it into land, and rock and molten magma, and iron that makes up the earth's crust (and below) why would this verse be necessary in the bible? "I tell you the truth, some standing here right now will not die before they see the Kingdom of Go" http://bible.cc/luke/9-27.htm LIES everybody 'standing here right now' is dead and they did not see the kingdom of god WHILE they where alive. There are more examples but I cannot be bothered to waste my time showing them to you, you have obviously seen them all before. “But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water.”
http://bible.cc/2_peter/3-5.htm
Lol, the earth wasn’t made out of water, even if it was and god somehow magically turned it into land, and rock and molten magma, and iron that makes up the earth’s crust (and below) why would this verse be necessary in the bible?

“I tell you the truth, some standing here right now will not die before they see the Kingdom of Go”
http://bible.cc/luke/9-27.htm
LIES everybody ‘standing here right now’ is dead and they did not see the kingdom of god WHILE they where alive.

There are more examples but I cannot be bothered to waste my time showing them to you, you have obviously seen them all before.

]]> Comment on Removing The Glove – Appropriate? by Neil http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/10/21/removing-the-glove-appropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-1580 Neil Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:09:16 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=353#comment-1580 What I mean is that I don't dislike the individual, I dislike the lifestyle and everything that goes along with it (which goes against The Bible) Does that make any more sense? What I mean is that I don’t dislike the individual, I dislike the lifestyle and everything that goes along with it (which goes against The Bible)

Does that make any more sense?

]]> Comment on Removing The Glove – Appropriate? by Brady http://blog.neilhanlon.com/2010/10/21/removing-the-glove-appropriate/comment-page-1/#comment-1578 Brady Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:40:59 +0000 http://blog.neilhanlon.com/?p=353#comment-1578 I have my disagreements and misunderstandings with what you said. One thing I don't understand is "I don’t agree with homosexuality. I have nothing wrong with the people, I have a problem with the thing itself." It seems like you're of two minds here. I'm not saying what you think is "wrong" or anything, all I'm saying is it doesn't make sense to me, and I don't imagine that it ever will simply because my views are so drastically different. Though I do agree that lines were crossed that shouldn't be after the performance with Ms. Riordan's speech. I have my disagreements and misunderstandings with what you said. One thing I don’t understand is “I don’t agree with homosexuality. I have nothing wrong with the people, I have a problem with the thing itself.” It seems like you’re of two minds here. I’m not saying what you think is “wrong” or anything, all I’m saying is it doesn’t make sense to me, and I don’t imagine that it ever will simply because my views are so drastically different.

Though I do agree that lines were crossed that shouldn’t be after the performance with Ms. Riordan’s speech.

]]>